(#tbt to 2017 and this post from Tumblr) What's the deal with pubic hair? Why do other mammals have furry bodies but shorter, finer hair on the pubic region while we have the opposite deal- mostly bare all over with a random bush between the legs? No one knows- evolutionary biologists, gynecologists, dermatologists, sexologists- we don't know. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But here are 5 theories: 1. Sexual decoration Since pubic hair growth only occurs after a surge of androgens and estrogens during adolescence, one evolutionary theory is that pubic hair serves as sexual ornamentation, a neon advertisement if you will, that says “I have reached sexual maturity and efforts to reproduce with me could be fruitful and worth your time and energy expenditure.” Of course we have no idea which came first- did pubic hair grow at puberty for purposes still unknown, and it became associated with sexuality as a secondary consequence due to it’s timing with sexual maturity, or inversely, did pubic hair grow specifically as a sexual signal once we evolutionarily lost most the rest of our body hair, making the genitals stand out against an otherwise hairless body? Pubes, you inspire more questions than you provide answers! 2. Eyelashes of the genitals A health function theory is that like eyelashes and nose hair, pubic hair exists to block and sweep away pathogens or other foreign particles from entering a bodily orifice. Sounds logical for vulvas, but I wonder why pubic hair would grow on the pubic bone instead of around the hole at the end of a penis (urinary meatus) if the purpose is to protect the body’s openings? And is there any evidence that pre-pubescent people or those who remove their pubic hair are getting sick more often because they don’t have pubic hair as a line of defense against pathogens? So many questions! There was one study that correlated infection of certain STIs with frequent pubic hair removal, but there is no way of knowing if the hair removal caused the increased likelihood of infections. They didn’t ask participants if they were having safe sex or if they were diagnosed with the STI before they started removing the hair or after. It could also be that the microscopic nicks from shaving creates pathways for infections to enter the body, but that doesn’t help us understand whether pubic hair exists to block disease and if we never grew pubic hair to begin with (vs growing it and then shaving it) would still have increased infection rates. One thing we do know, research has speculated that trends around pubic hair removal is suspected to be the cause of a decrease in the population of pubic lice. No pubes, no lice, I suppose. 3. Pheromone wafting Another evolutionary sexual theory is that pubic hair wafts pheromones into the air. Sebaceous gland secretions + dead skin + sweat = a scent that is individually unique and may be consciously or subconsciously sexually attractive to different people. The idea is that the pubic hair both traps it for the scent to intensify and then wicks it away for potential sexual partners to get a whiff of. But we know less about human pheromones than we do about pubic hair. Gah! 4. Genital HVAC system This theory posits that pubic hair serves to regulate the temperature of the genitals, trapping heat and keeping the area warm when needed, and wicking away sweat to keep the area cool when needed. Since like the skull, the skin in the genitals is thinner and blood vessels quite plentiful, there are more opportunities for heat to escape from the body than other parts so hair is needed for insulation. Fair theory, although it begs the question:
5. Car bumper of the loins Whether as a bumper between the genitals and the rocks and dirt our ancestors would sit on, or a bumper between the genitals and someone else’s genitals knocking together during sexual activity, the final evolutionary theory about why we have pubic hair is that pubic hair offers a layer of cushion and protection from abrasion to a very sensitive and vulnerable area.
But then of course one wonders if true, why other primates have thinner, finer hair on their genitals rather then thicker coarser hair. How are they protecting their genitals without pubes? The world may never know… Which ones do you think are most plausible? Do you have different theory about why humans have pubic hair? Do you have any rebuttals to these theories? Let me know in the comments!
4 Comments
Casey
5/14/2019 09:21:06 am
I have definitely found that my mons gets more irritated during penetration in certain positions when it has less hair on it... So I'm a fan of the bumper cushion idea...
Reply
Dr. Jill
5/22/2019 07:54:39 am
That's very plausible! I wonder too that if because we already have pubic hair, when we remove it, it causes irritation during penetration that may not have happened if there wasn't pubic hair there to begin with- like the follicles are the things getting irritated? Who knows! haha We are so confounded by the pubic hair :)
Reply
Melissa
9/27/2021 11:16:50 am
On women, our pubic hair makes sense. It can block out tiny particles from entering our vaginas. Also, it pushes our undies out a little bit to get airflow moving better to reduce the risk of yeast infections.
Reply
8/6/2022 02:20:29 am
I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. Such an informative article. Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Welcome
I invite you to comment and engage in this ever-growing digital sex ed library and community! I know it doesn't quite have the instant gratification of posting a comment on Facebook or Instagram, but it also doesn't have the corporate anti-sex censorship, so comment away! Just be kind. Categories
All
current subscribers and counting!
posts and counting!
Copyright Disclaimer
All content © Dr. Jill McDevitt, 2019. Permission to print and download for personal use only. Materials may not be shared on social media or elsewhere, and may not be used commercially. |